![]() ![]() ![]() It’s another found footage movie about a group of people trying to survive the same zombie outbreak in the same building, so there are definitely a lot of parallels between the two films. In some ways, REC 2 may seem like just a lazy rehash of the original. It’s pretty interesting, so when you combine it with the fun zombie action we’ve come to expect from the REC franchise, you get the clear pick for the number three spot on this list. Granted, this story isn’t quite as compelling as the first two, but it’s definitely better than anything we got from the third film. ![]() It’s a cool little mystery, and when the film finally shows its hand, that revelation leads to some further intriguing developments. It’s about a group of people who’ve been sequestered on a ship with some scientists, and at first, you don’t know why they’re there. Like I said before, REC 3 doesn’t really have anything interesting going on narratively, but this one does. I knew I would have to pay closer attention to these movies to figure out where to rank them, and after watching them and thinking about it, the choice was actually pretty clear.īoth of these films have the cool zombie action this franchise is known for, but there’s one thing that sets REC 4 above its predecessor. I knew that the first two films were the best (and I knew which would be number one), but I didn’t remember how the last two compared to each other. 3) REC 4: Apocalypseīefore I rewatched all four REC movies to make this list, I wasn’t sure which one would take the bottom spot. It just doesn’t have anything to elevate it above that absolute bare minimum level, so it’s easily the worst installment in the franchise. So at the end of the day, I’d say that REC 3 is worth a watch if you’re into fun, more or less mindless zombie action (sure, the monsters in this franchise aren’t reanimated corpses, but they look and act exactly like zombies, so they belong in that same general family), but if you want anything more than that, you can totally skip this one. Outside of a few lines, it doesn’t really tell us anything we didn’t already know before, and the little bit it does add just raises more questions than it answers. At best, it adds a tiny bit to the religious side of the franchise’s mythology, but it doesn’t give us anything substantial. It’s fun enough that it’ll keep you entertained once the action starts (although getting there is sometimes a bit of a slog), but that’s all it is. This isn’t a bad movie, but it’s not exactly a good one either. Those first two peculiarities don’t affect the quality of the film, but the last one definitely does, and it’s the reason REC 3 is at the bottom of this list. It’s the only movie that incorporates both found footage and traditional cinematography, it’s a spinoff rather than a continuation of the main franchise storyline, and it doesn’t have anything particularly interesting going on narratively. Do get back incase of question further.In a lot of ways, REC 3 is the odd one out in the series. Meaning only 10000 records will be held by last output file. Lastly, If we have more than 30000 records in input file and we didnt specify what to do for those records, so SORT will not bother about them.When we have any such criteria while splitting then below piece of code helps. In nutshell, we can make use of it, when we do not have any constraints on output record count.Say for eg, we have 40000 records in input file and we are dividing them into 3 output files, then we will be getting 10000+10000/3 records in the output file. Its implicitly splits the input file into output files 10000 records each. Of cos we can specify the count based on which split should happen, as below. ![]() If we have 3 output files for instance, the total input records divided by 3 will be record count of each input file.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |